<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airport scanners abuse. Already.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/634/airport-scanners-abuse-already/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/634/airport-scanners-abuse-already/</link>
	<description>Rants and musings from the Libertarian Left.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shared Hosting</title>
		<link>http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/634/airport-scanners-abuse-already/comment-page-1/#comment-3534</link>
		<dc:creator>Shared Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/?p=634#comment-3534</guid>
		<description>This was a interesting article to read, thank you for sharing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a interesting article to read, thank you for sharing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/634/airport-scanners-abuse-already/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/?p=634#comment-885</guid>
		<description>And here&#039;s the fundamental difference: you made an informed free choice. Under the current system, that&#039;s denied.

I also don&#039;t see how you managed to jump from &quot;I&#039;d choose it given a free choice&quot; to &quot;it&#039;s ok to coerce people into using these scanner&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s the fundamental difference: you made an informed free choice. Under the current system, that&#8217;s denied.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see how you managed to jump from &#8220;I&#8217;d choose it given a free choice&#8221; to &#8220;it&#8217;s ok to coerce people into using these scanner&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod</title>
		<link>http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/634/airport-scanners-abuse-already/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/?p=634#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Why not try this idea,have two identicle planes both bound for the same destination,passengers could then choose which plane to fly on.One plane the passengers would go through a scanner and the other plane passengers wouldnt have to go through a scanner, let me tell you that i would choose the scanner route every time no matter how long i was delayed because if someone gets on the plane with explosives then you are going to be delayed for ever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not try this idea,have two identicle planes both bound for the same destination,passengers could then choose which plane to fly on.One plane the passengers would go through a scanner and the other plane passengers wouldnt have to go through a scanner, let me tell you that i would choose the scanner route every time no matter how long i was delayed because if someone gets on the plane with explosives then you are going to be delayed for ever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

