<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15 minutes that sum up the drug debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/1068/15-minutes-that-sum-up-the-drug-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/1068/15-minutes-that-sum-up-the-drug-debate/</link>
	<description>Rants and musings from the Libertarian Left.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Well, shit, this could be interesting</title>
		<link>http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/1068/15-minutes-that-sum-up-the-drug-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>Well, shit, this could be interesting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/?p=1068#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>[...] the supporters of prohibition are limited to a hysterical clergyman (not exactly a fountain of rational thought), and Peter fucking Hitchens, you know the jig is up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the supporters of prohibition are limited to a hysterical clergyman (not exactly a fountain of rational thought), and Peter fucking Hitchens, you know the jig is up. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Civil Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/1068/15-minutes-that-sum-up-the-drug-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Civil Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/?p=1068#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been willing to accept a regulating market may well be the best of all solutions.

And let&#039;s face it, if they&#039;ll accept prohibition, they&#039;ll accept anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been willing to accept a regulating market may well be the best of all solutions.</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s face it, if they&#8217;ll accept prohibition, they&#8217;ll accept anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OD</title>
		<link>http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/1068/15-minutes-that-sum-up-the-drug-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1637</link>
		<dc:creator>OD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrcivillibertarian.co.uk/?p=1068#comment-1637</guid>
		<description>The details, though, at this point in time, are less important that winning the public over the basic point that prohibition fucks things up.

Because an unregulated, free market drug trade would be too much bullshit for the public.

Start of with the basic priciple, then maybe later on, the public will reach the rational conclusion that a completely unregulated drugs market would be the most efficient and cost reducing measure to introduce. 

Fat chance eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The details, though, at this point in time, are less important that winning the public over the basic point that prohibition fucks things up.</p>
<p>Because an unregulated, free market drug trade would be too much bullshit for the public.</p>
<p>Start of with the basic priciple, then maybe later on, the public will reach the rational conclusion that a completely unregulated drugs market would be the most efficient and cost reducing measure to introduce. </p>
<p>Fat chance eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

